I'd like to propose that this page merge with Feminist tech group design patterns. As that's the more extensive page, please discuss this on its talk page, not here, just to centralise the discussion somewhat. --Skud (talk) 00:32, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

RESULT: the two pages have been merged, and this one was the winner (because it had the more general name). Here is the discussion copied across from the other page:

I'd like to propose that we merge this page with Feminist geek group patterns which covers similar ground. I'm not sure that many of the patterns are specific to tech (vs. eg gaming, or atheism/skepticism) to the point where they need a whole separate page. Thoughts? --Skud (talk) 00:34, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

I agree. I could see either way being fine, though. Audreyr (talk) 01:47, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
As this is the *geek* feminist wiki and not the *tech* feminist wiki, I'd prefer to use the more general term, unless the content is in fact specific to tech. --Skud (talk) 03:43, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
Seems like a good idea to me. The reason for the tech page is just that I was talking to tech group leaders at the time of writing most of it. Thayvian (talk) 03:56, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
OK, I'm gonna do it. --Skud (talk) 03:58, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.